Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1303

reference
637-tree-1
name
1303
tree-preservation-order

undefined

637-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.046707 50.866829)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.046608 50.866819,-1.046612 50.866838,-1.046626 50.866856,-1.046648 50.866870,-1.046675 50.866879,-1.046706 50.866882,-1.046737 50.866880,-1.046765 50.866871,-1.046787 50.866857,-1.046801 50.866840,-1.046807 50.866820,-1.046802 50.866801,-1.046788 50.866783,-1.046767 50.866769,-1.046739 50.866760,-1.046708 50.866756,-1.046678 50.866759,-1.046650 50.866768,-1.046627 50.866782,-1.046613 50.866799,-1.046608 50.866819)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL